Contents
Catalog Links

Vernon College Supervisor’s Evaluation of Adjunct Instructor

Name: Position: Instructor
Rating period from: To:

Rate each instructor on a scale of 1-5 or N/A on each item.

  1. UNSATISFACTORY - Means that an employee’s work in that particular area is poor enough for his dismissal if not improved.
  2. FAIR - Means that work in this area must improve to become satisfactory.
  3. SATISFACTORY - Means good performance. This is the level of acceptable performance that each instructor must meet.
  4. VERY GOOD - Means that work is above the level required for satisfactory rating.
  5. OUTSTANDING - Means exceptional work approaching the best possible for the job.
  6. N/A - Not Applicable or not known
  A. Presents course materials consistent with learner outcomes using standard American English.
  B. Demonstrates current knowledge of subject and is well prepared for class.
  C. Uses instructional techniques and policies in accordance with the course syllabus and the employee handbook. (e.g. Early alert submissions, grade submissions and completion of the ESCR)
  D. Maintains a balance between freedom and control in the classroom.
  E. Presents well-planned and organized laboratory exercises (if applicable).
  F. Keeps abreast of major issues within the discipline and incorporates new content into courses as appropriate.
  G. Maintains accurate attendance and grading records.
  H. Prepares course outline in sufficient detail to meet the college requirements.
  I. Continues to learn and grow in skills and knowledge in accordance with the Vernon College professional development policy.
  J. Incorporates new methods in course delivery, including technology applications.
  K. Acts and performs in the best interest of the college in the classroom and in public.
  L. Participates in departmental activities commensurate with the needs of the college.
  M. Fulfills responsibilities of the job description.

Overall Appraisal:   Appraisal Average:  

General Appraisal: Summary of Student Surveys and Supervisor’s Evaluation Form.

What action was taken by the instructor since the last evaluation to improve quality of instruction and the program?





What is the plan of action for the next evaluation period to improve instruction and the program?





Written responses, if desired, made by faculty member to the evaluation.





Recommendation for Employment:




Signatures signifying completion of the conference. This evaluation will be retained by the College.
       
Faculty Member Date Supervisor  Date
       
Supervising Vice-President/Dean Date    


Up one level